Skip to main content

State v. Coon

Citations

  • 974 P.2d 386
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 28
  • 1999 WL 112397

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that HGN test results are admissible as circumstantial evidence of intoxication but inadmissible to establish a particular BAC
  • concluding that HGN test results are admissible as circumstantial evidence of intoxication but inadmissible to establish a particular blood-alcohol concentration [BAC] level
  • holding trial court did not err in admitting spectrographic voice evidence
  • adopting the federal Daubert standard for evaluating the admissibility of scientific evidence and expert testimony
  • applying both prongs to a prior case involving the admission of scientific evidence under Alaska Rule of Evidence 702, and overruling that case
  • applying both prongs to a prior case involving the admission of scientific evidence under Alaska Rule of Evidence 702, and overruling that case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

94 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

74 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Coon

16 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.