Skip to main content

People v. Collins

Citations

  • 68 Cal. 2d 319
  • 66 Cal. Rptr. 497
  • 36 A.L.R. 3d 1176
  • 438 P.2d 33
  • 1968 Cal. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “few defense attorneys, and certainly few jurors, could be expected to comprehend [the] basic flaw in the prosecutor’s [probability-based] analysis”
  • rejecting assumptions about the statistical probability of a couple other than the defendants having committed the crime being 1 in 12 million where several of the probabilities multiplied together, including hair and eye color, were obviously interdependent
  • prosecution attempted to prove identity in robbery case by totaling characteristics of defendant couple to show improbability of another couple possessing identical characteristics
  • prosecution attempted to prove identity in robbery case by totaling characteristics of defendant couple to show improbability of another couple possessing identical characteristics
  • prosecutor's calculation of probability that witness' description of defendants would match random persons inadmissible
  • mathematician’s opinion that there was one chance in twelve million that another couple possessed distinctive characteristics of two defendants had inadequate evidentiary foundation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, McComb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

131 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.