Skip to main content

Darling v. State

Citations

  • 808 So. 2d 145
  • 2002 WL 5497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding petitioner failed to demonstrate he was prejudiced from a purported violation of the Vienna Convention
  • holding the Vienna Convention applied where a capital defendant, charged with first-degree murder in the United States, was a foreign national and citizen of the Bahamas
  • holding the Vienna Convention applied where a capital defendant, charged with first-degree murder in the United States, was a foreign national and citizen of the Bahamas
  • “Darling has failed to demonstrate what specific prejudice, if any, has been incurred because of the missing transcripts.”
  • finding sufficient evidence of lack of consent to sexual activity where “the medical examiner was unequivocal in testifying that the abrasions in the victim’s vaginal area were evidence of forced sex”
  • rejecting Darling's argument that because there was no record of the hearings, meaningful review was precluded, and concluding that a new trial was not warranted where Darling failed to demonstrate prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

111 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Darling v. State

31 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.