Brim v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court's ruling admitting DNA evidence is subject to de novo review and is \reviewed as a matter of law rather than by an abuse-of-discretion standard\
• holding that \[a]ppellate review of a Frye determination will be treated as a matter of law\
• holding that the appropriate standard of review of a Frye issue is de novo
• explaining that \[a]ppellate review of a Frye determination will be treated as a matter of law\ and be reviewed de novo
• explaining that “[a]ppellate review of a Frye determination will be treated as a matter of law” and be reviewed de novo
• noting that the NRC disavowed the interim ceiling principle in its 1996 update

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).