District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/15/2003
Collier v. State
Citations
- 857 So. 2d 943
- 2003 WL 22336137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the state's evidence was insufficient to satisfy Frye
- holding SVR-20 test and testimony based upon it inadmissible based upon psychologist's admission that test was \somewhat experimental\ and questioned by some in psychological science community
- holding that the SVR-20 does not satisfy Frye
- testimony based in part on SVR-20 must pass the Frye test; testimony should not have been admitted because the state's evidence did not satisfy Frye
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. DenglerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-12-30· cited 96×
- Roeling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-30· cited 17×
- Matos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-30· cited 17×
- Ortega-Mantilla v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 6×
- In Re Commitment of BurtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-22· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court· 2002-01-22· cited 765×
- Goodwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
- Westerheide v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-17· cited 152×
- Brim v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
- Hadden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
- Flanagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-09· cited 95×
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
- Brim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-11· cited 16×
- Arnold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-30· cited 9×
- Gray v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-17· cited 5×
- Petit-Homme v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.