Supreme Court· 6/2/1997
Boggs v. Boggs
Citations
- 520 U.S. 833
- 117 S. Ct. 1754
- 138 L. Ed. 2d 45
- 1997 U.S. LEXIS 3396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that ERISA preempts conflicting state law, but not relying on ERISA's express preemption clause to reach that result
- deciding that ERISA preempts conflicting state law, but not relying on ERISA's express preemption clause to reach that result
- holding that state community property law that interfered with objectives of ERISA was preempted based on obstacle preemption
- holding that there was no need to reach the Section 514 preemption issue when state law conflicted with the anti-alienation provision
- holding that ERISA pension law preempted conflicting Louisiana community property law that allowed for the transfer of ERISA plan proceeds
- recognizing that preemption is required where compliance with both federal and state regulations is a physical impossibility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy, Breyer, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Ii-B-
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
369 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court· 2001-04-02· cited 737×
- Hennessy v. DuryeaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-01-14· cited 698×
- McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals· 2002-11-19· cited 446×
- Johnson v. CouturierNinth Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 384×
- Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 300×
- Raygor v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court· 2000-01-11· cited 286×
- Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 279×
- Otis J. Holloman v. Mail-Well CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2006-03-27· cited 247×
- Danca v. Private Health Care Systems, Inc.First Circuit· 1999-08-02· cited 235×
- Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase RivelandNinth Circuit· 2000-07-11· cited 215×
- Richardson v. SpanosCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-10-05· cited 192×
- Carolyn J. Gibbs v. Ashley C. Gibbs, a Minor Child and Andrew F. Gibbs, a Minor Child, Intervenor v. General American Life Insurance CompanyFifth Circuit· 2000-04-21· cited 182×
- Gobeille v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 2016-03-01· cited 173×
- Carmona v. CarmonaNinth Circuit· 2010-05-04· cited 165×
- BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. GreerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-10-01· cited 164×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. PriceThird Circuit· 2007-09-04· cited 149×
- Barnett v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court· 2002-02-14· cited 141×
- United States v. Raymond P. NovakNinth Circuit· 2007-02-22· cited 131×
- National Security Systems, Inc. v. IolaThird Circuit· 2012-11-08· cited 118×
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISAS.D. Texas· 2003-10-16· cited 114×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 6,517×
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 3,550×
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 2,980×
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 2,636×
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 1,937×
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 1,857×
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 1,769×
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 1,597×
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 1,315×
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 1,202×
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 976×
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court· 1954-01-04· cited 920×
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court· 1979-01-22· cited 837×
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 752×
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court· 1890-05-19· cited 717×
- Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 626×
- Lodge 76, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionSupreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 600×
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 541×
- Massachusetts v. MorashSupreme Court· 1989-04-18· cited 520×
Other cases named Boggs v. Boggs
23 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Boggs v. BoggsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-11-28· cited 17×
- Boggs v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1988-12-21· cited 14×
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1997-08-04· cited 14×
- Boggs v. BoggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-24· cited 12×
- Boggs v. BoggsMontana Supreme Court· 1947-02-18· cited 12×
- Boggs v. BoggsE.D. Louisiana· 1994-03-09· cited 10×
- Boggs v. BoggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-09-15· cited 6×
- Boggs v. BoggsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-03-29· cited 6×
- Boggs v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1959-12-11· cited 6×
- Boggs v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-10-21· cited 5×
- Boggs v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-12-31· cited 4×
- Boggs v. BoggsFifth Circuit· 1996-04-18· cited 3×
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1997-08-04· cited 2×
- Boggs v. BoggsFifth Circuit· 1996-07-18
- Boggs v. BoggsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-09-30
- Boggs v. BoggsHawaii Supreme Court· 1999-01-14
- Boggs v. BoggsHawaii Supreme Court· 2001-05-21
- Boggs v. BoggsFifth Circuit· 1997-08-20
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1997-03-03
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1997-03-03
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1996-11-01
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1996-12-16
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court· 1997-01-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.