Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran
Citations
- 536 U.S. 355
- 122 S. Ct. 2151
- 153 L. Ed. 2d 375
- 2002 U.S. LEXIS 4644
About this case
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran
Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States
in which the court held that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act
(ERISA) did not preempt
an Illinois
medical-review statute.[_clarification needed
_][1]
[2]
[3]
ERISA envisions a national standard for welfare and pension plans so state laws which "relate to" ERISA plans are preempted under Section 514 of ERISA. However, ERISA contains a "savings" clause which saves state laws which regulate insurance under Section 514(b). The statute at issue in Moran regulated insurance, which is one of the functions HMOs perform. Although HMOs provide healthcare as well as insurance, the statute does not require choosing a single or primary function of an HMO . Congress has long recognized that HMOs are risk-bearing organizations subject to state regulation. Finally, allowing States to regulate the insurance aspects of HMOs will not interfere with the desire of Congress for uniform national standards under ERISA .
This case was partially overruled in _Kentucky Ass'n of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller _, 538 U.S. 329 (2003).
References
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rush_Prudential_HMO,_Inc._v._Moran&action=edit§ion=1 "Edit section: References")
- ↑ Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002).
- ↑ Reinhart, Stephanie (January 1, 2004). "Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran: 21 or Bust! Does ERISA Preemption Give HMOs the Power to Gamble with Our Health?" . Akron Tax Journal. 19 (1). ISSN 0002-371X .
- ↑ Berman-Sandler, Leatrice (January 1, 2004). "Independent Medical Review: Expanding Legal Remedies to Achieve Managed Care Accountability" . Annals of Health Law and Life Sciences. 13 (1): 233. ISSN 1075-2994 .
External links
(https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rush_Prudential_HMO,_Inc._v._Moran&action=edit§ion=2 "Edit section: External links")
- Text of Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran, 536 U.S. 355 (2002) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Internet Archive (docket files) Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rush_Prudential_HMO,_Inc._v._Moran&oldid=1355911477 "
Editorial context from Wikipedia (CC-BY-SA 4.0).
Judges: Souter, Stevens, O'Connor, Ginsburg, Breyer, Thomas, Rehnquist, Scaua, Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.