Richardson v. Spanos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that appellate courts review an award of attorney’s fees for an abuse of discretion
• holding that “this court has consistently approved arrangements requiring the non-custodial parent to pay only a portion of the private school expenses even when the non-custodial parent’s income far exceeds that of the primary residential parent”
• holding that “this court has consistently approved arrangements requiring the non-custodial parent to pay only a portion of the private school expenses even when the non-custodial parent’s income far exceeds that of the primary residential parent”
• holding that “this court has consistently approved arrangements requiring the non-custodial parent to pay only a portion of the private school expenses even when the non-custodial parent’s income far exceeds that of the primary residential parent”
• holding that ―this court has consistently approved arrangements requiring the non-custodial parent to pay only a 11 portion of the private school expenses even when the non-custodial parent's income far exceeds that of the primary residential parent.‖
• holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in requiring each partially successful party to be responsible for their own legal expenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).