Johnson v. Couturier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 65(c) “invests the district court with discretion as to the amount of security required, if any.”
• finding likely 16 dissipation when defendant diverted nearly $35 million into his personal bank account 17 and was capable of placing assets “beyond the reach of a judgment”
• “A district court may . . . consider 17 hearsay in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction.”
• “A district 8 court may . . . consider hearsay in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction.”
• “A district court 28 may, however, consider hearsay in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction.”
• “Rule 65(c) invests the district court with discretion as to the amount of security required, if any.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).