Massachusetts v. Morash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Massachusetts criminal statute requiring employers to pay employees for unused vacation time was not preempted by ERISA because it did not concern an ERISA benefit plan
• resting deference to Secretary of Labor on specific congressional delegation of rule-making authority to “define accounting, technical, and trade terms”
• Supreme Court looks to provisions of whole law when interpreting federal statutes
• ERISA’s vesting provisions do not apply to welfare benefit plans

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).