Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a law \relates to\ an employee benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA's preemption provision \if [the law] has a connection with or reference to such a plan\
• recognizing that ERISA did not diminish rights employees would otherwise have had under Title YII of the Civil Rights Act
• holding that a plaintiff who The question in this case is simply whether § 252(e)(6
• holding that a state law was preempted by ERISA insofar as the state law prohibited practices that were lawful under ERISA
• holding that a state law was preempted by ERISA insofar as the state law prohibited practices that were lawful under ERISA
• determining that a state law \relates to\ employee benefit plans for purposes of ERISA preemption under 29 U.S.C. 1144(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).