Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase Riveland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Washington State Department of Corrections’ grievance process and Washington State’s tort claim process are adequate post-deprivation remedies for allegedly improper deductions from a prisoner’s account
• holding that ERISA’s anti-alienation provision does not pre- vent the seizure of retirement funds once distributed to the beneficiary and comparing the provision with the more encompassing anti-alienation restrictions of the Social Secur- ity Act
• noting that identification of a constitutionally protected interest required to 12 state a procedural due process claim
• concluding both 16 state tort claims and prison grievance procedures provide adequate post-deprivation 17 remedies
• noting that identification of a constitutionally protected 9 interest is required to state a due process claim
• noting that a “user fee” aimed at subsidizing the prison system was punitive because prisons promote deterrence and retribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).