· 12/3/1990
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon
Citations
- 498 U.S. 133
- 111 S. Ct. 478
- 112 L. Ed. 2d 474
- 1990 U.S. LEXIS 6121
- 5 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1601
- 90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8733
- 59 U.S.L.W. 4033
- 90 Daily Journal DAR 13667
- 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ERISA preempts state law wrongful discharge claim based on termination to avoid pension fund payments
- holding that ERISA preempts state law wrongful discharge claim based on termination to avoid pension fund payments
- holding that such an action must be brought under ERISA, 29 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq.
- holding that cause of action that depended upon the existence of an ERISA plan was preempted
- holding that ERISA preempts state law wrongful discharge claim based on termination to avoid pension fund payments
- holding that a state-law wrongful discharge claim was preempted because it was premised on the existence of the ERISA plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor, Ii-B, Ii-A, Rehnquist, White, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.