Otis J. Holloman v. Mail-Well Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that participant could not rely on assurances the plan participant may have received from HR department of his employer
• holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction over an attorney’s appeal when the sanctions were imposed only on the attorney, and the attorney was not listed on the party’s notice of appeal and did not file a separate notice
• holding that the Court lacked jurisdiction over an attorney’s appeal when the sanctions were imposed only on the attorney, and the attorney was not listed on the party’s notice of appeal and did not file a separate notice
• affirming denial of discovery motion based on “a failure to work with the defendants in good faith” during discovery process
• affirming denial of discovery motion based on “a failure to work with the defendants in good faith” during discovery process
• affirming denial of discovery motion based on “a failure to work with the defendants in good faith” during discovery process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).