Hawaii Supreme Court· 9/10/2001

Blair v. Ing

Citations

31 P.3d 184
96 Haw. 327
2001 Haw. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that an action is in the nature of assumpsit where the claim arises out of the contractual relationship
concluding that it would be impracticable to apportion fees where one of only two claims sounded in tort
stating that “a defendant who succeeds in obtaining a judgment of dismissal is a prevailing party for the purpose of fees under HRS § 607-14”
stating that, “[i]n the absence of opposition [regarding the reasonableness of costs], we presume the ... costs were reasonable”
noting that the supreme court had upheld dismissal of the complaint because the defendant \owed Plaintiffs no duty\ as a matter of law
allowing documented costs without inquiry into their reasonableness because “no opposition was received regarding the reasonableness of the costs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Intermediate, Levinson, Moon, Nakayama, Ramil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.