Skip to main content

Doe v. Doe

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 1085
  • 98 Haw. 144
  • 2002 Haw. LEXIS 216

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • opining that \the court's administrative interest in enforcing the limits on trials should not supersede the court's obligation to consider relevant evidence to determine the best interests of the child in a custody hearing\
  • stating that motions for reconsideration are reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • dealing with good cause in a paternity action, but with respect to a motion for new trial
  • applying a “good cause” standard to a motion for a new family court trial
  • applying a “good cause” standard to a motion for a new family court trial
  • taking judicial notice of the Hague Convention under HRE Rule 202(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.