Eastman v. McGowan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying HRS § 657-1(4) to plaintiffs’ claims that defendant fraudulently misrepresented to them that she would reconvey real property to them
• discussing the legislative history of the amended HRS § 607- 14
• “Prejudgment interest, where appropriate, is awardable under [Haw.Rev.Stat.] § 636-16 (1993) in the discretion of the court.”
• specifically noting that “[t]he legislature did not intend to require a written agreement for attorneys’ fees in an action in assumpsit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).