Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[r]econsideration is not a device to relitigate old matters or to raise arguments or evidence that could and should have been brought during the earlier proceeding\
• affirming an order denying a motion to amend complaint because the trial court had justifiable reasons for denying the motion
• denying Plaintiffs motion to amend Complaint because Plaintiff unduly delayed proposing her additional claim
• discussing abuse of discretion standard of review for denial of leave to amend
• affirming circuit court's denial of leave to amend complaint where hearing on motion to amend was held two weeks prior to trial, and motion was filed seven days after discovery deadline and nearly four years after pre-trial statement referring to unpled claims had been filed
• \The trial court' s grant or denial of attorneys' fees and costs is reviewed under the abuse of discretion standard.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).