Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 1/28/1997

Helfand v. Gerson

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 530
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 1015
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 633
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he greater weight of federal authority . . . supports the position that judicial estoppel applies to a party’s stated . . . legal assertion”
  • explaining that the plaintiff waived their challenge to defendant’s discovery objection by failing to bring a motion to compel
  • explaining that the plaintiff waived their challenge to defendant’s discovery objection by failing to bring a motion to compel
  • stating in an analogous Ninth Circuit case that, without a contract between the defendant-attorney and his client, which creates the lawyer’s duty, the third-party plaintiffs would have no legal malpractice claim
  • \Courts have extended the right to sue for breach of contract to intended third-party beneficiaries.\
  • failure to obtain information was plaintiffs’ fault when they did not challenge the 3 assertion of privilege or bring a motion to compel production

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beezer, Gonzalez, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

66 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.