Porter v. Hu

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding misconduct, but not gross and flagrant, where prosecutor suggested to jury it may convict if it believed it was reasonable that the defendant committed the crime
• discussing allegations that an agent “wrongfully lost his book of business as a result of the parent insurer’s misconduct”
• granting relief on a theory of unjust enrichment where an express contract “did not provide for redress of the specific harm done”
• stating “the absence of an adequate remedy at law” 1s a “necessary prerequisite” to bring a suit for an equitable remedy (citation and quotation marks omitted)
• “One who receives a benefit is of course enriched, and he would be unjustly enriched if its retention would be unjust.”
• \the damages alleged to have resulted from the tort are different in type and character from those arising under the equitable principle of unjust enrichment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).