Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an abuse of process defendant’s “primary motivation constitutes a question of fact that cannot be resolved by way of a[] . . . Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.”
• stating that “this tort provides no clear definition of the prohibit ed [outrageous] conduct” (quotation and citation signals omitted)
• permitting IIED claim based on conduct alleged to have occurred during the proceedings of a prior lawsuit
• indicating the covenant of good faith does not extend to activities occurring before consummation of an insurance contract
• indicating the covenant of good faith does not extend to activities occurring before consummation of an insurance contract
• indicating the covenant of good faith does not extend to activities occurring before consummation of an insurance contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2010-08-18· cited 4×
• Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-30