Schulz v. Honsador, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]n action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of as-sumpsit, inasmuch as a warranty arises from the contractual relationship between buyer and seller”
• nature of right or claim is determined from facts stated, issues raised, and allegations contained in pleadings
• “Assumpsit is a common law form of action which allows for recovery of damages for the non-performance of a contract, either express or implied, written or verbal, as well as quasi contractual obligations.”
• “An action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of assumpsit, inasmuch as a warranty arises from the contractual relationship between buyer and seller, and a breach of warranty constitutes a breach of contract.”
• \[a]n action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of assumpsit\
• breach of warranty constitutes a breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel, Bruce Lee Jorgensen v. Benjamin B. Cassiday, III Salvador Laurel
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-02-06· cited 409×
• Troyer v. Adams
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2003-09-25· cited 126×
• TSA International Ltd. v. Shimizu Corp.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1999-12-30· cited 123×
• Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 113×
• Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-09-30· cited 110×
• Helfand v. Gerson
  Ninth Circuit· 1997-01-28· cited 110×
• Blair v. Ing
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-09-10· cited 95×
• Porter v. Hu
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-10-04· cited 75×
• Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 61×
• Coll v. McCarthy
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 52×
• Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. Riley
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-08-11· cited 50×
• Eastman v. McGowan
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1997-09-29· cited 45×
• Leslie v. Estate of Tavares
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-28· cited 34×
• Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate Of Bernice Pauahi Bishop
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-10-06· cited 28×
• S. Utsunomiya Enterprises, Inc. v. Moomuku Country Club
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1994-08-22· cited 28×
• Casumpang v. ILWU LOCAL 142
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2005-10-18· cited 23×
• Azer v. Myers
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-07-16· cited 21×
• Kona Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of Bishop ex rel. Peters
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-10-06· cited 19×
• Records v. Briggs
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-12-13· cited 17×
• Forbes v. Hawaii Culinary Corp.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1997-09-19· cited 16×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Au v. Au
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1981-03-23· cited 115×