Skip to main content
· 11/8/1984

Schulz v. Honsador, Inc.

Citations

  • 690 P.2d 279
  • 67 Haw. 433
  • 1984 Haw. LEXIS 135

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a]n action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of as-sumpsit, inasmuch as a warranty arises from the contractual relationship between buyer and seller”
  • nature of right or claim is determined from facts stated, issues raised, and allegations contained in pleadings
  • “Assumpsit is a common law form of action which allows for recovery of damages for the non-performance of a contract, either express or implied, written or verbal, as well as quasi contractual obligations.”
  • “An action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of assumpsit, inasmuch as a warranty arises from the contractual relationship between buyer and seller, and a breach of warranty constitutes a breach of contract.”
  • \[a]n action for breach of warranty clearly is in the nature of assumpsit\
  • breach of warranty constitutes a breach of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lum, Nakamura, Padgett, Hayashi, Wakatsuki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.