D.S.I. v. Natare Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that settlement agreement, along with, an injunction, was sufficient judicial intervention to entitle plaintiff to prevailing party status
• concluding that party was prevailing party when \the litigation culminated successfully for Natare in a judicial order that altered the litigants' legal relationship in a way favorable to Natare\
• where we held that a ruling on a motion is not a judgment under IC. $ 34-52-1-1
• A party may be construed as prevailing for purposes of I.C. 34-52-1-1(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).