Bishop v. Okidata, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss because the court could not resolve inquiries concerning whether, inter alia, emotional distress was severe based on the pleadings alone
• “Congress’s postponing of the effective date evidences an intent not to apply the new regulations until their effective date.”
• specifically holding that ADA does not apply to conduct occurring after enactment but before effective date
• \Congress's postponing of the effective date evidences an intent not to apply the new regulations until their 10 effective date.\
• “A court may properly consider undisputedly authentic documents attached to the motion papers of either party in deciding a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).