Knickman v. Prince George's County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s First and Fourteenth Amendment claims should be grouped together under the same statute of limitations pursuant to § 1983
• applying laches when the plaintiff took two years to serve the defendant after filing suit, and the relevant EEOC file had been destroyed
• granting defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss because plaintiff’s claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations
• granting defendant’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss because plaintiff’s claim was barred by the applicable statute of limitations
• “All of Plaintiff’s claims have been dismissed, therefore, her motion for summary judgment is moot.”
• “A three years statute of limitations applies to claims of wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).