Sauers v. Salt Lake County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that intentional tort claims and certain state constitutional tort claims might not be preempted by the Act, even though claims stemming from sexual harassment were preempted
• noting that “claims which assert a different injury than the [UADA] covers, such as intentional tort claims, . . . are not necessarily preempted by the Act if an independent cause of action exists outside the Act for such claims”
• reviewing identical statutory language in a superseded version of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).