Skip to main content
· 5/5/1998

Reddinger v. Hospital Central Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 4 F. Supp. 2d 405
  • 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1222
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 221
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6592
  • 1998 WL 230042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the discrimination by association provision does not require an employer to restructure an employee’s work schedule to enable the employee to care for a relative with a disability because that provision does not require the employer to provide a reasonable accommodation
  • stating administrative charge is not blueprint for litigation to follow
  • stating administrative charge is not blueprint for litigation to follow
  • “[I]n order to state a claim under the FMLA, a complaint must at least contain allegations which establish that, within the meaning of the FMLA, the defendant employer is an ‘employer’ and the plaintiff employee is an ‘eligible employee.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joyner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.