Skip to main content
· 7/16/1996

Schanzer v. Rutgers University

Citations

  • 934 F. Supp. 669
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11053
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,467
  • 1996 WL 434387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiff's Pierce claim because the “NJLAD provides the full panoply of rights and remedies that are available under the common law.”
  • declining to follow Verde and holding that “[i]f the defendant is not plaintiff’s employer, ... it is irrelevant whether that person was acting in an official or individual capacity, for a Title VII suit may not be properly maintained against the individual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simandle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.