· 7/16/1996
Schanzer v. Rutgers University
Citations
- 934 F. Supp. 669
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11053
- 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,467
- 1996 WL 434387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing plaintiff's Pierce claim because the “NJLAD provides the full panoply of rights and remedies that are available under the common law.”
- declining to follow Verde and holding that “[i]f the defendant is not plaintiff’s employer, ... it is irrelevant whether that person was acting in an official or individual capacity, for a Title VII suit may not be properly maintained against the individual.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simandle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.