Lane v. Maryhaven Center of Hope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no cause of action for employment discrimination under the ADA against a supervisor in his “official” or representative capacity
• holding that individuals could be sued in their official capacity under Title VII
• holding that individuals could be sued in their official capacity under Title VII
• collecting cases finding that there is no individual liability under the ADA based on Second Circuit’s decision in Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295 (2d Cir. 1995), which held there is no individual liability under a similar provision of Title VII
• [D]istrict courts within the Second Circuit to consider the issue have concluded that there is no cause of action under the ADA against an individual as an agent of his or her employer.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).