Barco-Sandoval v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a determination about whether a petitioner has established “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” is a “discretionary judgment[] [that the Court] lack[s] jurisdiction to review”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to review any legal argument that is so insubstantial and frivolous as to be inadequate to invoke federal-question jurisdiction.”
• “[W]e lack jurisdiction to review any legal argument that is so 3 insubstantial and frivolous as to be inadequate to invoke federal- question jurisdiction.”
• “[W]e lack 3 1 jurisdiction to review any legal argument that is so 2 insubstantial and frivolous as to be inadequate to invoke 3 federal-question jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).