Argueta v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that consideration of an improper factor would raise a question of law
• distinguishing between raising the consideration of a prohibited factor as a question of law and raising the balancing of factors as an unreviewable factual determination
• distinguishing between consideration of a prohibited factor, which raises a question of law, and balancing of factors, which is an unreviewable factual determination
• distinguishing between consideration of a prohibited factor, which raises a question of law, and balancing of factors, which is an unreviewable factual determination
• finding the “contention that the IJ weighed factors that the IJ was prohibited from considering is quite distinct from the unreviewable argument that the IJ balanced improperly those factors that the IJ could consider”
• “Argueta’s contention that the IJ weighed factors that the IJ was prohibited from considering is quite distinct from the unreviewable argument that the IJ balanced improperly those factors that the IJ could consider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).