Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Title VIPs numerosity requirement is nonjurisdietional even though it serves the important policy goal of “spar[ing] very small businesses from Title VII liability”
• holding that an objection that a complaint failed to state a claim could not be asserted post-judgment
• holding that Title VII’s numerosity requirement is nonjurisdictional even though it serves the important policy goal of “spar[ing] very small businesses from Title VII liability’’
• holding that a statutory requirement in 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, 2000e-5(f) was an element of a cause of action rather than a jurisdictional requirement
• holding that a Title VII provision exempting employers with fewer than 15 employees was not jurisdictional
• holding that a Title VII provision exempting employers with fewer than 15 employees was not jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).