Pareja v. Attorney General of the United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the BIA’s interpretation of the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” standard is a permissible construction of the statute (citations omitted)
• noting that the Attorney General may cancel an alien’s removal only if “the alien meets her burden of establishing eligibility”
• noting that exceptional and extremely unusual hardship is the standard for cancellation of removal cases
• noting that exceptional and extremely unusual hardship is the standard for cancellation of removal cases
• explaining that someone who has conceded removability and seeks cancellation of removal has the burden of showing eligibility for cancellation
• observing that a legal claim is not colorable if it is immaterial and made solely for the purpose of obtaining jurisdiction or is wholly insubstantial and frivolous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).