Skip to main content
· 4/12/1995

Pedro Pablo Hidalgo-Disla v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 52 F.3d 444
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that contrary rule could result in endless continuances
  • dismissing petition for review as frivolous after “conclud[ing] that, although [petitioner’s] challenge justifies detailed evaluation, it nevertheless cannot be argued in good faith on the merits”
  • dismissing petition for review as frivolous after “conclud[ing] that, although [petitioner’s] challenge justifies detailed evaluation, it nevertheless cann ot be argued in good faith on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Mahoney, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.