Second Circuit· 12/6/2010
Rosario v. Holder
Citations
- 627 F.3d 58
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 24882
- 2010 WL 4923557
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that agency’s “factfinding, factor- balancing, and exercise of discretion normally do not involve legal or constitutional questions”
- noting that the regulation invites “the exercise of considerable discretion in assessing the totality of the circumstances”
- finding that district court did not have jurisdiction over petition to review the BIA's cancellation of petitioners' application to cancel removal
- stating that mixed questions of law and fact in BIA decisions are renewable where BIA’s underlying factual determination is flawed by error of law
- setting the substantive standard for special rule cancellation of removal for battered spouses
- “[T]he BIA’s factfinding, factor-balancing, and exercise of discretion normally do not involve legal or constitutional questions, so we lack jurisdiction to review them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Raggi, Rakoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patel v. GarlandSupreme Court· 2022-05-16· cited 493×
- Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2020-08-19· cited 97×
- Xiu Qing You v. NielsenS.D. Illinois· 2018-08-02· cited 41×
- Morris v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2012-04-23· cited 20×
- Bedoya-Melendez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2012-05-17· cited 16×
- Mehrdad Hosseini v. Jeh JohnsonSixth Circuit· 2016-06-17· cited 15×
- United States v. DaleySecond Circuit· 2012-12-07· cited 14×
- Gomez Heredia v. SessionsSecond Circuit· 2017-07-27· cited 14×
- Twum v. BarrFirst Circuit· 2019-07-09· cited 14×
- Ballardo Castro v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2013-08-16· cited 11×
- Juras v. GarlandSecond Circuit· 2021-12-17· cited 7×
- Sandhu v. United StatesE.D. New York· 2013-01-08· cited 6×
- Yu Mei Chen v. NielsenE.D. New York· 2019-03-06· cited 5×
- Linares-Urrutia v. SessionsSecond Circuit· 2017-03-07· cited 2×
- Torres v. Rock & River Food Inc.S.D. Florida· 2016-08-19· cited 2×
- Freire v. Department of Homeland SecurityD. Connecticut· 2016-02-18
- Rosario v. HolderSupreme Court· 2011-06-27
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-12-07· cited 2,764×
- Barco-Sandoval v. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2008-01-25· cited 309×
- Mendez v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2009-05-08· cited 269×
- Laura Luis Hernandez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-10-07· cited 191×
- Luis Sepulveda v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, 1Second Circuit· 2005-05-04· cited 120×
- Rodriguez v. GonzalesSecond Circuit· 2006-06-07· cited 73×
- Argueta v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2010-08-06· cited 52×
- Perales-Cumpean v. AshcroftTenth Circuit· 2005-11-25· cited 43×
- Wilmore v. GonzalesFifth Circuit· 2006-07-05· cited 25×
- Stepanovic v. FilipSeventh Circuit· 2009-01-28· cited 23×
- Johnson v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2010-04-16· cited 16×
Other cases named Rosario v. Holder
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.