Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that we have jurisdiction when the BIA commits legal error in its discretionary determinations
• concluding that the agency applies the correct legal standard where it expressly cites and ap plies relevant ease law in rendering its decision
• concluding that the agency applies the correct legal standard where it expressly cites and applies relevant case law in rendering its decision
• concluding that the BIA applies the correct legal standard where it expressly cites and applies relevant ease law in rendering its decision
• concluding that the agency applies the correct legal standard where it expressly cites and applies relevant case law in rendering its decision
• holding that Ramadan is inapplicable to the “ ‘exceptional and extremely unusual hardship’ standard” because it is “subjective” unlike the “ ‘changed circumstances’ standard” at issue in Ramadan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).