Garcia-Aguillon v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying petitioner’s legal claim because “it amounted] to nothing more than a challenge to the IJ’s discretionary and fact-finding exercises cloaked as a question of law.”
• \[Petitioner]'s first argument fails to state a colorable legal claim because it amounts to nothing more than a challenge to the IJ's discretionary and fact-finding exercises cloaked as a question of law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).