Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/21/1997

Baker v. State

Citations

956 S.W.2d 19
1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35
1997 WL 266361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s finding 7 of future dangerousness
holding that by failing to object to the untimely setting, the appellant failed to preserve his complaint that the trial judge should have held a hearing
holding that “[i]n the absence of actual [police] coercion, the fruits of a statement taken in violation of Miranda need not be suppressed under the ‘fruits’ doctrine”
holding mere violations of Miranda rule are not covered by the state exclusionary rule contained in article 38.23
noting that “whether a recognized exception to a federal exclusionary rule also applies to Article 38.23 depends upon whether the exception is consistent with the language of Article 38.23”
holding mere violations of Miranda rule are not covered by the state exclusionary rule contained in article 38.23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Keller, Overstreet, Womack, Points

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.