Skip to main content

Wehrenberg, Michael Fred

Citations

  • 416 S.W.3d 458
  • 2013 WL 6479977
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that evidence from a source independent of any illegal police act is not “obtained” in violation of the law and is not subject to exclusion under Article 38.23
  • holding that whether court of appeals erred by deciding that independent source doctrine conflicts with statutory exclusionary rule and is inapplicable in Texas was a question of law to be reviewed de novo
  • adopting federal independent source doctrine and holding that, despite prior illegality, evidence lawfully obtained from an independent source was not “obtained” in violation of the law and was not subject to suppression under Article 38.23
  • no State v. Martinez 26 APPELLATE CAUSE NO. 03-14-00588-CR exclusion when there is an independent source
  • no exclusion when there is an independent source
  • no exclusion when there is an independent source

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alcala, Keller, Price, Womack, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

80 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wehrenberg, Michael Fred

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.