Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 871 S.W.2d 744
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 26
  • 1994 WL 68781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding attenuation analysis applicable under article 38.23 as a method of determining whether evidence was “obtained” in violation of law
  • no exclusion when there is attenuation of taint
  • no exclusion when there is attenuation of taint
  • no exclusion when there is attenuation of taint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overstreet, Clinton, McCormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

139 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.