Skip to main content

Baker v. Baker

Citations

  • 900 P.2d 764
  • 183 Ariz. 70
  • 195 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 51
  • 1995 Ariz. App. LEXIS 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an appellant is responsible for ensuring there is a complete trial court record, including transcripts, on appeal
  • holding we may assume the court’s findings are supported by the record when the parties fail to provide the relevant transcripts
  • assuming that an unfurnished transcript would support the family court’s findings and conclusions
  • noting where appellant fails to ensure record on appeal contains necessary information, we presume the missing information supports the court’s ruling
  • explaining appellate court presumes that missing portions of the record support the superior court’s decision
  • explaining the appellant “is responsible for making certain the record on appeal contains all transcripts or other documents necessary for [the court] to consider the issues raised on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fernandez, Pelander, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Baker v. Baker

317 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.