Cunningham v. Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it well established that depreciation and depletion expenses, allowed under federal income tax law without proof of actual loss, will not automatically be deducted from gross income in determining alimony and equitable distribution
• trial court is obliged to conduct independent review of evidence when ruling on exceptions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baker v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-25· cited 184×
• In Re the Marriage of Gaer
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1991-10-16· cited 71×
• Fennell v. Fennell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-06-01· cited 52×
• Trembach v. Trembach
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-07· cited 41×
• Labar v. Labar
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-08· cited 41×
• McAuliffe v. McAuliffe
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-16· cited 40×
• Sirio v. Sirio
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-24· cited 29×
• Asfaw v. Woldberhan
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-27· cited 16×
• Labar v. Labar
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-07-11· cited 10×
• Holland v. Holland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-08-16· cited 8×
• Second Breath v. Dept. of Public Welfare
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-06-15
• Kress v. Kress
  Alleghany County Court of Common Pleas· 1999-02-11

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sutliff v. Sutliff
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-01· cited 125×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. ReDavid v. ReDavid
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-12-02· cited 40×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hagerty v. Eyster
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-08· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Miller
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-03-17· cited 39×
• Dunn v. Teti
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-08-22· cited 34×
• Rollman v. Rollman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-09-26· cited 28×
• Flory v. Flory
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-06-12· cited 25×
• Eck v. Eck
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-04-27· cited 24×
• Vajda v. Vajda
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-16· cited 24×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maier v. Maier
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-01-25· cited 23×
• Benson v. Benson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-20· cited 20×
• Commonwealth ex rel. Caplan v. Caplan
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-28· cited 17×
• Lyday v. Lyday
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-30· cited 16×
• Williams v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-04-21· cited 12×
• Parkinson v. Parkinson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-07· cited 11×