Baker v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where the evidence offered by one party is uncontradicted, the court may adopt this value even though the resulting valuation would have been different if more accurate and complete evidence had been presented.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-14· cited 127×
• Schenk v. Schenk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-07-19· cited 97×
• Rimel v. Rimel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-08· cited 5×
• McCane v. McCane
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2006-04-05
• Martinez v. Martinez
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 2014-01-22

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Teodorski v. Teodorski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-12· cited 98×
• Litmans v. Litmans
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-03-20· cited 77×
• Smith v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-01· cited 59×
• Aletto v. Aletto
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-10· cited 46×
• Butler v. Butler
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-24· cited 39×
• Solomon v. Solomon
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-17· cited 33×
• Buckl v. Buckl
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-04-06· cited 32×
• Holland v. Holland
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-02-12· cited 32×
• Anderson v. Anderson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-04-17· cited 30×
• Geyer v. Geyer
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-02-18· cited 26×
• Fishman v. Fishman
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-08-01· cited 10×