In Re the Marriage of Pearson v. Pearson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court’s failure to rule on motions for attorneys’ fees implies that the motions were denied
• explaining the failure to rule on a motion constitutes an implicit denial of the motion
• “We consider whether sufficient evidence supports the court’s conclusions regarding . . . disputed items of imputed income.”
• decision on attorney fees “lies within the trial court‟s sound discretion, „with the focus on the parties‟ relative abilities to pay the fees incurred‟”
• court may deviate from the guidelines if “application of the guidelines is inappropriate or unjust in a particular case” and deviation is in the best interests of the child.
• failure to rule on a motion is implicit denial of the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).