Reeck v. Mendoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we do not address issues on appeal not presented to the family court
• holding “signed support order by the family court is a final decision by its nature,” and entry thereof functions as a final, appealable judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Natale v. Natale
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-04-16· cited 21×
• In Re the Marriage Of: Bollermann v. Nowlis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 18×
• Lopez v. Food City
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-02-25· cited 2×
• Engstrom v. McCarthy
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-01-09

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jesus M. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-09-05· cited 687×
• Baker v. Baker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-25· cited 184×
• Marriage of Fuentes v. Fuentes
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-28· cited 124×
• Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-16· cited 72×
• Barassi v. Matison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-22· cited 69×
• Nydam v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-12-29· cited 68×
• Sorensen v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-31· cited 60×
• Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-05-03· cited 60×
• Premier Financial Services. v. Citibank
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-07-27· cited 51×
• Craig v. Craig
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-06-29· cited 48×
• In re Sabino R.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-26· cited 46×
• Ghadimi v. Soraya
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-08-30· cited 32×
• In Re the Marriage of Kassa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-04-12· cited 14×