Supreme Court of Minnesota· 12/31/1992
Baker v. Baker
Citations
- 494 N.W.2d 282
- 1992 Minn. LEXIS 391
- 1992 WL 394740
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that district court need not make best interests findings when making custody and parenting-time decisions in OFP proceedings and that oral findings regarding safety under section 518B.01 are sufficient
- stating that section 518B.01 was enacted to protect victims of domestic assault and is designed to curtail harm
- “the availability of extraordinary relief intended by the passage of the Domestic Abuse Act is utterly negated by tying to it unnecessary external procedural requirements”
- \the availability of extraordinary relief intended by the passage of the Domestic Abuse Act is utterly negated by tying to it unnecessary external procedural requirements\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gardebring
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Burkstrand v. BurkstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-08-30· cited 81×
- Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-04-30· cited 52×
- Bartsch v. BartschSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-11-15· cited 41×
- Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-12-20· cited 39×
- Gada v. DedefoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-08-03· cited 35×
- Beardsley v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-31· cited 30×
- Marriage of Haefele v. HaefeleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2001-01-02· cited 29×
- State v. KarasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-10-12· cited 29×
- Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-08· cited 21×
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-02-11· cited 17×
- Mechtel v. MechtelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-07· cited 14×
- Hughs on Behalf of Praul v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1997-12-23· cited 9×
- Beardsley v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-05-22· cited 8×
- Whalen Ex Rel. Whalen v. WhalenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-06-08· cited 8×
- El Nashaar v. El NashaarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-03-07· cited 6×
- Halverson Ex Rel. Halverson v. TaflinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-10-03· cited 6×
- Rew v. BergstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-12-27· cited 3×
- Zentz v. GraberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-01-27· cited 2×
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Lethem v. LethemHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2011-06-30· cited 1×
- Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. CoonsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2011-03-22· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.