Baker v. Baker
Citations
- 70 A. 418
- 108 Md. 269
- 1908 Md. LEXIS 104
Syllabus
<p>Appointment of Receiver Under Bill for Partition of Property — Notice to Defendants Before Appointment — Appeal—Presumption as to Parties — Lis Pendens — Right of Mortgagee After Default to Rent of Property Mortgaged.</p> <p>Code, Art. 16, sec. 192, provides that the Court may at any stage of a cause concerning property, pass such order as it may see fit in regard to the possession of the sampendente lite, or the receipt of the income thereof, on such terms as to it may seem just. Held, that this statute does not authorize the appointment of a receiver, under a bill for partition, before the defendant has an opportunity to be heard, unless there be a necessity for such appointment arising from fraud or danger of loss possession of the property be not taken by the Court.</p> <p>The objection that there was no necessity for appointing a receiver of the property before the defendants were heard in reply to an application therefor, can be made upon appeal from the order making the appointment.</p> <p>Upon appeal from an order appointing a receiver of property, under a bill filed for partition of the same among the parties entitled thereto as heirs of the deceased owner, when the record does not affirmatively show that all of the parties in interest had been brought into Court by subpoena or order of publication, it will be presumed that, when the order was passed, all the necessary parties had been actually or constructively served with process.</p> <p>One who takes an assignment of a mortgage after the institution of a ' suit for the partition of the land mortgaged, to which snit the mortgagee was a party, takes subject to the lis pendens.</p> <p>In a suit begun by a bill for the partition of the real estate of a decedent, some of the defendants filed a petition alleging that the real estate had • descended to them as heirs of law of the owner, subject to the dower interest of the widow and subject, as to a portion of the land, to two mortgages, and asked for the ap
Judges: Boyd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Indurated Concrete Corp. v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1950-06-07· cited 23×
- In Re Bethesda Air Rights Ltd. PartnershipD. Maryland· 1990-07-20· cited 20×
- Eubanks v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan Assoc., Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-02· cited 4×
- Spivery-Jones v. Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-05-19· cited 4×
- Seeger v. KeechBaltimore City Circuit Court· 1927-01-14
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blondheim v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1857-12-15· cited 47×
- Lamm v. BurrellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1888-06-13· cited 21×
- Board of County School Commissioners v. Board of County School CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-03-15· cited 17×
- Supreme Lodge, Order of the Golden Chain v. SimeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1898-06-30· cited 14×
- Sanders v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1885-05-15· cited 12×
- Knighton v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1864-11-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.