Supreme Court of Florida· 7/10/2003
Allen v. State
Citations
- 854 So. 2d 1255
- 2003 WL 21543556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the suicide theory “was only a small part of an overall defense that Allen did not commit the murder”
- determining that the suicide theory “was only a small part of an overall defense that Allen did not commit the murder”
- finding that a defendant must allege specific facts that, if accepted as true, -8- establish a prima facie case that the State possessed evidence favorable to the accused
- stating that “[t]he defendant’s duty to exercise due diligence in reviewing Brady material applies only after the State discloses it” and therefore “[o]nce the State obtained the results of the hair analysis, it was required to disclose them to the defendant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sochor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-07-08· cited 228×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 124×
- Allen v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2010-07-14· cited 107×
- State v. HueblerNevada Supreme Court· 2012-04-26· cited 99×
- Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-14· cited 83×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-03-23· cited 74×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-20· cited 69×
- Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-12· cited 62×
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-11-17· cited 56×
- Overton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-29· cited 55×
- Archer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-06-29· cited 55×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-12-18· cited 54×
- Mordenti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-16· cited 54×
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-07-03· cited 53×
- Hannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-08-31· cited 52×
- Windom v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-05-06· cited 52×
- Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-01-27· cited 38×
- Everett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-24· cited 36×
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2008-08-28· cited 32×
- Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-07-12· cited 30×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 331×
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-24· cited 205×
- Bottoson v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-24· cited 192×
- King v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-24· cited 139×
- Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-06-08· cited 134×
- Doorbal v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-30· cited 122×
- Larkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-07-08· cited 114×
- Bruno v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-12-06· cited 103×
- Aig Life Insurance Co. v. PadfieldSupreme Court· 2002-12-02· cited 78×
- Maharaj v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-30· cited 76×
- Arbelaez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-13· cited 73×
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-11-10· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.