Skip to main content

Johnson v. State

Citations

  • 904 So. 2d 400
  • 2005 WL 977017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “Florida’s reliance on its capital sentencing has been entirely in good faith” in light of the legal precedent upholding its constitutionality
  • holding that Ring does not apply retroactively
  • \We hold that . . . the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona . . . does not apply retroactively in Florida.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

99 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.