Skip to main content

Allen v. State

Citations

  • 662 So. 2d 323
  • 1995 WL 424438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a photograph is admissible if relevant to an issue at trial, either independently or to corroborate other evidence, unless the probative value is outweighed by undue prejudice
  • distinguishing between the “penalty proceeding” before the advisory jury and the “sentencing proceeding” before the judge
  • distinguishing between the “penalty proceeding” before the advisory jury and the “sentencing proceeding” before the judge
  • “[T]here was no indication that counsel had investigated Allen’s background or history to determine whether particular mitigating evidence was available. Counsel also made no proffer of mitigating evidence that could be presented to the court.”
  • “[T]here was no indication that counsel had investigated Allen’s background or history to determine whether particular mitigating evidence was available. Counsel also made no proffer of mitigating evidence that could be presented to the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.